EcoCity

ENERGY
DESCRIPTION BENEFITS CONSIDERATIONS LEED (Planned)
Wind Turbines

Provide small localized and/or large centralized wind turbine(s) across the site

Provide emission‑free renewable energy

Supplement existing power source, can power electric vehicle at night

Provide iconic large scale turbine emphasizing the commitment of the development

Large turbine will have structural implications

Large turbines have noise implications to miligate

Requires additional electrical equipment

Turbines will need a screen cover to protect birds

Economic viability varies from 10 years for smaller units to approx. 4 years for larger centralized unit

LEED certificated

Power Generation

Provide heat and power generation equipment on site (i.e. microturbine)

Provide high-efficiency on-site electricity and heat generation

Supplement existing heat and power source or use as emergency power

Recovered heat is easily used across the site for multiple applications

Due to the high heat demand, it can be considered a primary product and power

Local codes for self‑generator need to be considered

Careful power and heat supply‑and‑demand balance should be made to operate at maximum efficiency and avoid waste energy

Requires additional electrical equipment

Economic viability for this technology is between 5 and 8 years

LEED certificated

Natural Ventilation

Design buildings with natural ventilation system for cooling

Reducing the need for mechanical cooling in buildings reduces energy consumption

Provide a healthier indoor environment by having 100% outside air ventilation

Provide the occupants with the option of using mechanical or natural ventilation

Occupant comfort might be slightly compromised at certain times

Advanced facade design will be required to optimize natural ventilation

Outdoor noise and pollution might force mechanical ventilation at certain times

Economic viability depends on strategy and added construction cost. Estimated 5 years payback

LEED certificated

Envelope Upgrade

Improve performance of renovated buildings envelope including walls, windows and roofs. This is achieved by replacing ele­ments, adding insulation, or refinishing surfaces

Reducing thermal loss throug envelope, reduces energy consumed for heating and cooling

Increase thermal and lighting comfort in the occupied space

Replacing some of the envelope elements might slightly alter the look of the facades

Adding insulation to walls might slightly reduce internal floor area

Economic viability in the range of 3 – 4 years payback on energy costs avoided

LEED certificated

Central Plant

Use existing central plant building to provide centralized heating and cooling to the building

The use of larger more efficient mechanical equipment will reduce energy consumption

Increase thermal and lighting comfort in the occupied space

Slightly higher costs than localized systems

Requires pipe layout between the central plant and all the supplied buildings

Economic viability of a central facility has payback in 8 – 10 years compared to localized equipment

LEED certificated

River Cooling

Use the existing 200mm water pipe from the river for free cooling

Reducing the need for mechanical cooling reduces the electrical con­sumption

Reduce noise from the central plant by shutting down mechanical cooling equipment

Consider local codes for allowable temperature rise of water let back into the river

The existing size of the pipe will only allow for a limited amount of cooling for the river

Requires additional mechanical equipment to avoid contamination of the river water

Economic viability for added equipment cost is in the 5‑8‑year‑payback range

LEED certificated

Solar Thermal

Install solar collectors to provide hot water for space heating and domestic hot water (central and local)

Provide emission‑free renewable energy

Reducing the need for boiler heating reduces the gas consumption and flue emissions

Reduces utility bill for building occupants

Still requires backup boilers as system will not always meet the demand

Hamburg's weather is not ideal for solar energy

Economic viability is between 5 and 10 years payback depending on use for heat energy and potential incentives

LEED certificated

Photovoltaik

Install large centralized photovoltaicsystem (PV array) and small localized buildings‑integrated systems (8 PV)

Provide emissions-free renewable energy

Supplement existing power source, can power exterior lighting

Expensive technology compared to payback

Hamburg's weather is not ideal for solar energy

Requires additional electrical equipment

Economic viability for PV varies depen­ding on incentives – in Germany estimated to be between 6 and 10 years

LEED certificated